Wednesday, November 23, 2016

Hamilton, Response to Asbury Park Press Editorial

November 23, 2016



My response to the Asbury Park Editorial, " 'Hamilton' shot itself in the foot"
(The online version of this editorial was titled, "Poor Staging by 'Hamilton.' ")


I am not an emotional person so I was surprised by my reaction to an editorial I found in the Asbury Park Press today.  It takes a great deal to tick me off, but for many reasons this editorial raised my hackles. The online version can be found at:
http://www.app.com/story/opinion/editorials/2016/11/22/hamilton-mike-pence-trump/94294264/

The editorial appeared to have been written by an elderly dowager who was offended by a wrongly perceived lack of civility rather than by the editorial staff of a newspaper.  Considering everything that has been said and done during this election cycle I was astonished at the attitude and tone,

I felt that I had to respond.  At this point, I don't know if they will publish my letter or not.  They limit submissions to 250 characters, but the editor has the discretion to make exemptions.  I submitted two letters.  The first was around 450 characters.  I deleted the first and next to the last paragraph and submitted a second version.  The following is the first version in its entirety:

Re: Your November 23, 2016 editorial, ‘Hamilton’ shot itself in the foot


There was a letter to the editor the day this editorial ran.  In it, the author called those who did not support President-elect Trump as “educated elites.”  I found it ironic, because your editorial, “ ‘Hamilton’ shot itself in the foot,” came across stuffy, self-righteous and elitist.

The editorial stated that the message delivered by cast member, Victor Dixon, was a “major turn off” and that it was perceived as “inappropriate and disrespectful.”  President-elect Trump doesn’t know the meaning of either word.  He mocked John McCain’s service.  He ridiculed a handicapped reporter.  His comments about women, Muslims, Mexicans and Jews have been beyond the pale, yet we should be offended by a few actors expressing their concerns over their place in his presidency?

Yes, Pence took the high road in his response to their plea, but his political stances on women’s reproductive rights and his antagonistic history with the LGBT community are cause for trepidation.  This man supports gay conversion therapy and people aren’t supposed to speak out about that?

African-Americans are afraid of being stopped for traffic violations.  Muslims are afraid of having to register.  The members of the LGBT community are afraid of losing their rights.  People are genuinely frightened by Trump’s rhetoric and Pence’s positions. By speaking out, the cast didn’t just express their fears, but the fears of many Americans.

People were horrified by what happened in Ferguson, yet are offended by the cast welcoming Pence and asking for his help?  The purpose of protest is to garner attention for a cause.  Protest isn’t supposed to be pretty.  It is supposed to make you uncomfortable.  You can’t tie it up in a pretty bow to make it palatable or wish it away.  Gandhi showed us that you can protest peacefully which is exactly what the cast did.  So what this boils down to is that some members of the audience were offended by their approach? 

The editorial stated that, “ ‘Hamilton’ ” shot itself in the foot,” the implication being that by speaking out the cast did themselves harm in some way.  I saw no evidence of this on social media.  The majority of posts on Facebook and Twitter were supportive.  Thousands offered to buy tickets from anyone who was offended.  The show is sold out for over a year so financially there will be no impact from those who called for a boycott. 

We are fortunate to live in a country where we can speak our minds.  This isn’t about rudeness, but is about fighting racism and bigotry.  When given the opportunity, I will choose the latter every time.

_______________________________________________________________________________